
AI and the Shiny Tool Trap: How Poor Implementation Misses the Metrics that Matter
Oct 16, 2024
3 min read
1
11
2
Recently, I built a new website, testing different platforms to see what would get me live quickly and effectively. I wanted a basic but attractive site, something I could build in 20 minutes—no bells and whistles, just a site that worked. For me, the ultimate “aha” moment would be selecting a template, making a few tweaks, and hitting publish. Instead, I found myself watching a loading bar crawl across the screen as the platform’s AI struggled to understand what I needed.
The process was designed around a flashy AI-driven setup, where I was prompted to describe my website goals in an empty text box. Instead of a quick and straightforward template click, I was trapped in an experience that missed the mark. Here’s where it faltered:
Overly Complex Input: Typing out what I needed took longer than selecting a visual template, adding friction to the setup.
Assumptions on User Knowledge: The platform assumed I knew precisely how to describe my vision in a way that matched their model’s metadata.
Lagging Response Times: After entering details, I was left staring at a loading bar as the platform processed my input.

With no progress in sight, I left—an experience sabotaged by a focus on AI over functionality. This brought to mind a valuable lesson: integrating AI effectively requires focusing on core metrics like “time to aha moment” and latency, not just adding flashy features.
The Metrics Every Product Team Should Track
When A/B testing a new feature, especially something as pivotal as AI integration, it’s critical to keep core analytics at the forefront:
Time to Aha Moment: Track how long it takes users to reach the point of delight or value. If a feature makes this longer, it’s likely missing the mark.
Latency: Loading times matter; slow responses are a quick way to lose users.
Conversion within Funnel Stages: Tracking user flow across each stage, from template selection to final publishing, reveals drop-offs or friction points.
Session Count to Conversion: How many times does a user need to revisit before committing? Fewer sessions signal a smoother experience.
Abandonment Rate per Feature: If users consistently abandon at a particular feature, it may need rethinking or streamlining.
Each of these metrics provides insight into the user journey, showing where friction might occur and helping product teams to fine-tune the experience. Had the product team tracked these in their A/B testing, they might have quickly identified where their AI-driven setup introduced unnecessary hurdles.
A great example of an AI feature that evolved with user experience in mind comes from OpenAI’s approach to image generation. Originally, users would type in a text prompt and receive an image directly. However, OpenAI discovered that users often struggled to articulate their vision clearly, especially given the precise language needed for the AI to interpret prompts accurately. To address this, OpenAI is testing into the following process:
User provides a text prompt
The model returns a detailed text description based on this prompt
User refines or confirms the description
Final image generation
Although it appears that OpenAI is still learning and refining this experience, the iterative process is a step in the right direction for improving the user experience, aligning it with what customers could understand and interact with more comfortably.
Don’t Just Implement AI; Focus on the Customer Journey
AI is powerful, but without understanding the fundamentals of user experience, it can backfire. Success in AI doesn’t mean abandoning the basics of good UX design and measurement; it means doubling down on them. Every new feature should enhance the journey, not complicate it. Measure, test, refine, and remember: a shiny tool is only useful if it truly meets the user’s needs.
AI is here to stay, but implementing it wisely means finding balance—leveraging its strengths without compromising the experience that keeps users coming back.







I’m sorry to hear about your experience. I've seen similar issues with other tools. While the demos look great, AI hasn’t always lead to big improvements. Company executives seem to be in a rush to integrate AI into every application, so things aren’t being thoroughly tested before being released.